Atm_Thght's Blog

Mike Monsoor, a Navy EOD Technician, was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor posthumously for jumping on a grenade in Iraq , giving his life to save his fellow Seals.
 
During Mike Monsoor's funeral in San Diego, as his coffin was being moved from the hearse to the grave site at Ft. Rosecrans National Cemetery, SEALs were lined up on both sides of the pallbearers route forming a column of two's, with the coffin moving up the center.  As Mike's coffin passed, each SEAL, having removed his gold Trident from his uniform, slapped it down embedding the Trident in the wooden coffin.

The slaps were audible from across the cemetery; by the time the coffin arrived grave side, it looked as though it had a gold inlay from all the Tridents pinned to it.  This was a fitting send-off for a warrior hero.
 
This should be front-page news instead of the BLEEP we see everyday.

Since the media wont make this news, I choose to make it news by forwarding it onto you guys. I am damn proud of our military. If you are proud too, please pass this on.  If not then rest assured that these fine men and women of our military will continue to serve and protect.  
 
 

"Gay-Marriage" is a disgusting misnomer used to cover-up a celebration of unnatural affection and unity.

'Permissive Societies' condone 'the weird and the warped' acting-out-people to create a spiraling society 'downward' by displacing the normal and the sane.

What are your thoughts and beliefs?

"The office of the president is simply too important to trust to someone other than a person whose loyalties are 100 percent American, and while it is impossible to read into the heart of a man or woman we do have the test our forefathers gave us. Which is this office is not to be entrusted to anyone but a natural U.S. citizen," he said.

Multiple requests over a period of several days by WND to the Obama campaign for a comment or explanation of the birth certificate issue did not generate any response.

The Israel Insider said, "The revelation that [the birth certificate] of Obama's own sister was evidently used to create the electronic forgery represents what supporters of this analysis claim is a 'smoking gun' that appears to implicate Sen. Obama directly. Hawaii law limits access to vital records to family members only, a fact which slowed down the ability of researchers to compare the purported Obama 'birth certificate' – which displayed from the start a peculiar provenance and inexplicable features – to genuine specimens. Therefore, it would seem that either Maya K. Soetoro-Ng (as she is now called) supplied the document or its image to half-brother Barack or his campaign, or Obama/his campaign used it without her permission.

"The stakes couldn't be higher. Even the Snopes anti-rumor site acknowledges that Obama's constitutional fitness to be president depends solely on his being born in the United States, because his mother – not yet 19 at the time of his birth – would not have had a sufficient number of years as an adult citizen, according to the laws prevailing at the time, to pass on 'natural born citizenship' automatically," the report said.

"There have been reports, so far unconfirmed, that Obama was born outside the country, either in Kenya, his presumed father's native land, or in Canada. The fact that the Obama campaign has been touting as genuine a forgery since June 12 will likely increase pressure to not only account for the fake but produce a genuine paper birth certificate. Obama, in his book 'Dreams from My Father,' specifically mentioned having such a document in his possession, but it has not been submitted for public inspection or analysis if it in fact exists," the report said.

The forensic computer investigators interviewed by the news publication concluded there are two obvious possibilities for the birth certificate image: A real certificate was scanned and digitally edited or a real certificate was scanned for the graphic layout, then blanked by soaking the document in solvent to remove the toner.

The certificate was published by the Daily Kos June 12 following initial reports questioning Obama's place of birth. He's stated he was born in Hawaii, but if that was not the case, his citizenship could be uncertain, since his father was not a citizen and his mother was not old enough to pass along American citizenship automatically.

The issue originally was raised by Jim Geraghty, reporting on the Campaign Spot, a National Review blog. He cited the "unlikely" possibility that Obama's 1961 birth was not within the U.S.

At the time, he wrote, "If Obama were born outside the United States, one could argue that he would not meet the legal definition of natural-born citizen … because U.S. law at the time of his birth required his natural-born parent (his mother) to have resided in the United States for 10 years, at least [f]ive of which had to be after the age of 16.'"

He then pointed out Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, was 18 when Obama was born, "so she wouldn't have met the requirement of five years after the age of 16."

When the Daily Kos website posted an image that appeared to be Obama's birth certificate, Geraghty announced he was satisfied.

The presumptive Republican nominee for president, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., already has gone through a similar challenge, and the U.S. Senate responded with a resolution in April declaring him to be a "'natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States."

The article declares "no person except a natural born citizen … shall be eligible to the office of president."

* McCain was challenged because he was born to two U.S. citizens in the Panama Canal Zone.

Wrote Langbert, "Mr. Obama has refused to produce a physical certified, stamped copy of his birth certificate. An electronically displayed imaged displayed by his official campaign website has alleged to have been a forgery. … We request that the FEC require Mr. Obama to authorize the FEC to obtain an official copy of his birth certificate."

Mitchell Langbert  an online petition to the Federal Election Commission in which signers are asking the agency to "take responsibility to verify the eligibility of Mr. Barack H. Obama to be President of the United States."

This Madhi is the Messiah that Islam is expecting to return and lead Islam in a Holy Jihad (war) against Israel, America and all the nations that refuse to accept the religion of Islam. They believe that at the time the Islamic nations are strong enough to defeat these people that the Madhi will come out of a cave in the desert. That he will be the returned 12th imam that disappeared in the year 868 coming back to bring justice to the Earth. Of course this justice is to kill every living Christian and Jew in the world. He is expected to come out of the desert to be met in Damascus Syria by none other than Jesus himself who they believe died and was buried somewhere in Israel. This resurrected Jesus will meet with the Mahdi in Damascus where they will pray together and then work together to kill everyone on the face of the Earth who does not receive the prophet Mohammed and Allah as their God. Remember Jesus said, "When they say I am in the desert or here or there, believe it not."

When looking at the beast in Revelation 13:1 we are reminded who some of the nations of the anti-Christ will be. From what the book of Daniel taught us it is very clear who seven of these nations will be. The mouth of the lion on this beast is Iraq, the bear's feet on the beast is Iran, the body of this beast is made up of Egypt, Syria, Turkey and Greece. Iraq will play a very strong role because it shows Iraq as the mouth of the lion. I doubt very seriously that the anti-Christ will come from Iraq because of the other prophecies in Daniel that says that he will come from one of the four nations that were under Alexander the Greats kingdom. Iraq is the old nation of Babylon and doesn't come from any of these. The fact that they are shown as a mouth of a lion is significant in this way. A lion roars very loud sometimes to the point of shaking the ground. You certainly notice when he speaks. I believe that Iraq is going to give a very strong voice of support for the anti-Christ and will help convince millions of Muslims to follow after him. This will be the most notable thing about them. But in order for this to happen something is going to have to take place in that part of the world. America and her allies in Iraq are going to have to leave. I believe that it is American presence in Iraq that is preventing Iran and Syria from teaming up with the Hezbollah and trying to invade Israel. America stands between Iran and their allies or they would destroy Israel. The Iraqis are right about one thing in their belief and that is that it is America that is preventing the Muslim nations from becoming strong enough to began an invasion on Israel and America. 

* But they shall react! 

'Persia' (Iraq, Iran and Syria) shall be destroyed by the Men of 'Chittim' (the West)!

Can't we all just get along?

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D85yrIgA4Nk&featur
e=related 

The year is 1907, (101 years ago......)

Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907.
 
'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag.... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.'
Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Do you believe the 'churches' are actually living up to what they all 'seemingly' profess regarding {virtue vs. sin} in their contradictious display of priestly pedophiles, sexual exploits, drunkenness, homosexuality, greed and so on, (within their own actions) against what they state in their teachings?  What should your standards be and what do you cling to and hold in value?

Who do you trust?

• The big and proper question is (why)?